Sandisk Ultra 3d Ssd Average Read Write Ssddashboard
The SanDisk Ultra 3D is a new client SSD similar to that of the WD Blue 3D. Because this drive is on the lower finish of the functioning scale, its main application will be general upgrades from an HDD-based organization to solid-land engineering science for faster boot upward times and speedier overall operation. It should also exist noted that WD has the same drive nether its own brand, so this is substantially an identical SSD with a different sticker slapped on information technology.
The SanDisk Ultra 3D is a new customer SSD like to that of the WD Blue 3D. Because this drive is on the lower end of the performance scale, its main application will exist general upgrades from an HDD-based system to solid-state technology for faster boot up times and speedier overall performance. Information technology should likewise exist noted that WD has the same drive under its own brand, so this is essentially an identical SSD with a different sticker slapped on it.
As its proper name indicates, SanDisk's new SSD uses 3D NAND and nCache ii.0. It also features stupor and vibration resistance for increased reliability. The SanDisk Ultra 3D SSD is managed through the visitor'south Dashboard, which gives users real-time visibility into how the drive is performing every bit well every bit cloning software, tools for disk analysis, and alerts for firmware updates. SanDisk quotes the Ultra 3D with upwardly to 560MB/s and 530MB/south in sequential read and write speeds respectively (550MB/s and 525MB/s for the 250GB model) while random reads and writes throughput is expected to attain upwards to 95,000 IOPS and 84,000 IOPS, respectively.
Backed by a 3-year warranty, the SanDisk Ultra 3D comes in capacities of 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB with prices ranging from equally lilliputian as $99 to $550. For our review we will be looking at the 1TB model.
SanDisk Ultra 3D Specifications
- Interface: SATA Revision 3.0 (6Gb/s)
- Available capacities: 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB
- Seq. Read (up to): 550MB/due south, 560MB/s, 560MB/s, 560MB/s
- Seq. Write (up to): 525MB/s ,530MB/s, 530MB/s, 530MB/s
- Rnd. Read (up to): 95K IOPS, 95K IOPS, 95K IOPS, 95K IOPS
- Rnd. Write (up to): 81K IOPS, 84K IOPS, 84K IOPS, 84K IOPS
- TBW: 100, 200, 400, 500
- Dimensions: 2.75 10 iii.96 x 0.28 in. (69.95 mm x 100.5 mm ten 7.0 mm)
- Operating temperature: 32ºF to 158ºF (0ºC to 70 ºC)
- Shock Resistant up to 1500 G @ 0.5 m/sec
- Vibration: 5 gRMS, 10-2000 HZ / 4.nine gRMS, 7-800 HZ
- Warranty: Limited 3-yr warranty
Design and build
The SanDisk Ultra 3D uses a 7mm form gene and is identical to other SanDisk SSDs with the exception of the model proper name, as the company hasn't changed the look of their drives for several years. Equally such, it has the usual smooth and refined black metal enclosure with white, black and red colour scheme. As we mentioned in a higher place, SanDisk'south aluminum example is designed to resist shocks and vibrations to preserve data integrity.
Every bit information technology is identical to the WD Blue 3D SSD, we did not open up the case to see the inner workings that tin exist seen through that review.
Consumer Synthetic Benchmarks
All consumer SSD benchmarks are conducted using the StorageReview HP Z640 Workstation. We compared the SanDisk Ultra 3D SSD to the following drives:
- Intel 545S SSD (512GB)
- Samsung 850 Pro SSD (1TB)
- Samsung 850 Pro SSD (2TB)
- ADATA SU900 SSD (512GB)
- Crucial MX200 SSD (500GB)
- Crucial MX200 SSD (1TB)
- Micron M600 SSD (1TB)
- OCZ VX500 SSD (512GB)
- WD Blue SSD (1TB)
All IOMeter figures are represented as binary figures for MB/s speeds.
In our 2MB sequential criterion, the SanDisk Ultra 3D came in 2d spot in reads backside the ADATA SU900 with a score of 505.63MB/s. For write performance the drive 4th with 460.69MB/s.
In our random 2MB benchmark, the SanDisk drive came in second to last in read performance with 432.28MB/s. With writes, the drive placed sixth with a score of 454.95MB/s.
The purpose of our random 4k benchmark is to put more strain on the drives in terms of throughput. Nether these weather, the SanDisk placed right in the middle of the pack with a read functioning of 32.84MB/s and 111.51MB/due south write.
With the same test looking at IOPS, the SanDisk over again placed in the middle with a read score of 8,406.19 IOPS and a write score of 28,546.03 IOPS.
In terms of our 4K write latency criterion, the SanDisk had an average latency of 0.0349ms placing it sixth and a max latency of only 1.21ms placing it third.
For our next 4K examination, we motility to a workload with 100% write activity, which scales from 1QD to 64QD. Hither the SanDisk ran effectually the centre of the pack throughout peaking at about 74K IOPS.
In our 4k aligned write the SanDisk performed much better finishing third overall with a peak score of 95.6K IOPS.
Our final consumer-constructed benchmarks compare the drives in a serial of mixed-server workloads with a queue depth of 1 to 128. Each server contour has a strong bias towards read activity, ranging from 67% read with the database profile to 100% read in the web server profile.
The database profile features a 67% read and 33% write workload, focusing on transfers effectually 8K in size. The SanDisk ran virtually the bottom of the pack though it did vanquish the WD Blue in performance. The SanDisk peaked at 33K IOPS.
Our side by side benchmark is the read-merely web-server profile, which uses transfer sizes ranging from 512 bytes to 512KB. Here the SanDisk found itself in the heart of the pack with a peak score of 21K IOPS.
During the file-server profile, which has 80% read and 20% write workload spread out over multiple transfer sizes ranging from 512-bytes to 64KB, the SanDisk plant itself hanging with a rough crowd of depression performers. The drive came in 3rd with a pinnacle score of 28K IOPS.
The last profile looks at workstation activity, with a 20% write and lxxx% read mixture using 8K transfers. The SanDisk was nearly matching the poor performance of the WD Blue, though slightly worse with a peak score of 32K IOPS.
Consumer Real-Globe Benchmarks
While the results of constructed benchmarks are of import in identifying the cardinal strengths and weaknesses of a drive, performance in these tests does not always translate directly into real-earth situations. To get a better idea how the SanDisk Ultra 3D drive volition handle itself in the field, we will chart StorageMark 2010 HTPC, Productivity, and Gaming traces against comparable drives. Higher IOPS and MB/s rates with lower latency times are preferred.
The commencement trace is based on use as a Dwelling house Theater PC (HTPC). The test includes playing 1 720P HD motion picture in Media Thespian Classic, i 480P SD movie playing in VLC, iii movies downloading simultaneously through iTunes, and one 1080i HDTV stream existence recorded through Windows Media Center over a fifteen-minute flow.
In our HTPC profile, the SanDisk performed in the upper stop of the pack with scores of vii,739 IOPS, 353.31MB/s, and an average latency of ane.004ms. This is a fairly large improvement over the WD Blue.
The next trace simulates disk activity in an function workstation or productivity scenario. This exam includes three hours of functioning in an office productivity environment with 32-bit Windows Vista running Outlook 2007 continued to an Exchange server, web browsing using Chrome and IE8, editing files within Office 2007, viewing PDFs in Adobe Reader, an hour of local music playback, and two hours of streaming music via Pandora.
In the productivity trace, the SanDisk Ultra found itself in the heart of the pack with scores of 7,320 IOPS, 216.82MB/s, and an average latency of 1.059ms. Again improving upon the WD Blue.
The last consumer existent-life criterion simulates disk activeness during gaming. This simulation taxes the drive's read performance, with 6% write operations and 94% read operations. The examination consists of a Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit system pre-configured with Steam, with Grand Theft Auto four, Left iv Expressionless 2, and Mass Outcome two already downloaded and installed. The trace captures the heavy read activity of each game loading from the start, as well as textures equally the game progresses.
In our gaming criterion, the SanDisk plant itself nigh the bottom once more with scores of 8,020 IOPS, 431.65MB/s, and an average latency of 0.966ms.
Conclusion
The SanDisk Ultra 3D is a client SSD that leverages 3D NAND that is being marketed as an HDD replacement. As with most SSDs, users will see an comeback in performance, boot time, endurance, and a reduction in latency swapping out their HDD for flash. The drive comes in 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB capacities. It will also come with daze and vibration resistance and SanDisk software similar SSD Dashboard. The drive is more or less identical SanDisk version of the WD Blue 3D SSD leveraging the same NAND in a branded model.
Looking at functioning the drive is more or less average to beneath average. The drive started off with adequately strong 2MB sequential performance (505.63MB/s read and 460.69MB/due south write). In our first fix of 4k benchmarks the drive institute itself in the centre of the pack with i shining moment of decent max latency of 1.21ms. Aligned write gave an average performance while the drive placed in the top three for aligned read. In our mixed workload benchmarks the SanDisk Ultra had 1 expert placement (in the heart) in read-centric spider web-server and roughshod in the bottom of the pack with the other iii with a heavier write focus. In our consumer real-world benchmarks the SanDisk had a decent HTPC score, medium productivity score, and a bottom of the pack gaming score.
Pros
- Improves its performance over the WD Blue non-3D NAND model it replaces
- 2TB model aligns with other ind ustry leading capacity offers
Cons
- Less than impressive benchmark numbers
- Lower three-year warranty versus others at 5-years
The Bottom Line
The SanDisk Ultra 3D SSD is an comeback over the WD Blue and volition piece of work every bit an HDD replacement at an bonny price betoken.
SanDisk Ultra 3D on Amazon
Discuss This Review
Sign up for the StorageReview newsletter
Source: https://www.storagereview.com/review/sandisk-ultra-3d-ssd-review
0 Response to "Sandisk Ultra 3d Ssd Average Read Write Ssddashboard"
Post a Comment